« Beating the Bush for Patterns | Main | A Tangled Tale »

A Prayer for Archimedes

By Julie J. Rehmeyer

For seventy years, a prayer book moldered in the closet of a family in France, passed down from one generation to the next. Its mildewed parchment pages were stiff and contorted, tarnished by burn marks and waxy smudges. Behind the text of the prayers, faint Greek letters marched in lines up the page, with an occasional diagram disappearing into the spine.

The owners wondered if the strange book might have some value, so they took it to Christie's Auction House of London. And in 1998, Christie's auctioned it off—for two million dollars.

For this was not just a prayer book. The faint Greek inscriptions and accompanying diagrams were, in fact, the only surviving copies of several works by the great Greek mathematician Archimedes.

f8914_1623.jpg

The top layer of writing in this 700-year-old book describes Christian prayers. But underneath, almost obliterated, are the only surviving copies of many of the works of the ancient Greek mathematician Archimedes.
The owner of the Archimedes Palimpsest.

An intensive research effort over the last nine years has led to the decoding of much of the almost-obliterated Greek text. The results were more revolutionary than anyone had expected. The researchers have discovered that Archimedes was working out principles that, centuries later, would form the heart of calculus and that he had a more sophisticated understanding of the concept of infinity than anyone had realized.

Archimedes wrote his manuscript on a papyrus scroll 2,200 years ago. At an unknown later time, someone copied the text from papyrus to animal-skin parchment. Then, 700 years ago, a monk needed parchment for a new prayer book. He pulled the copy of Archimedes' book off the shelf, cut the pages in half, rotated them 90 degrees, and scraped the surface to remove the ink, creating a palimpsest—fresh writing material made by clearing away older text. Then he wrote his prayers on the nearly-clean pages.

What happened to the monk's book after that is unclear, but in 1908, Johan Ludwig Heiberg, a Danish philologist, discovered it in a library in Constantinople. He was astonished to find that the book contained previously unknown texts by Archimedes. He studied the book in detail, puzzling out the faint letters with a microscope. His efforts brought the works to the attention of scholars around the world, but after he had completed his transcription, the book again disappeared until nearly a decade ago, when it was auctioned off at Christie's.

f8914_2660.jpg

These are two images of a single sheet from the book. The picture on the left is an ordinary photograph, with the Archimedes text barely visible. The picture on the right is a multi-spectral image, and the Archimedes text and diagrams are mostly legible.
The owner of the Archimedes Palimpsest.

The book's anonymous buyer has funded an enormous research project on the volume. First, intensive conservation and restoration stabilized the condition of the book itself. Then the researchers took digital pictures of it in different wavelengths of light, creating a multi-spectral image that could be manipulated to reveal the text by Archimedes. On four of the pages, forged paintings covered the entire text, so the researchers used x-ray fluorescence imaging to peek beneath the paintings and decipher the obscured text.

f8914_3929.jpg

Sometime after Johan Heiberg examined the book in 1906, someone painted gold-leaf images over four of the pages (left). Multispectral imaging couldn't peer beneath the reflective metal paint, but x-ray fluorescence imaging revealed the underlying text (right).
The owner of the Archimedes Palimpsest.

Two of the texts hiding in the prayer book have not appeared in any other copy of Archimedes's work, so no one but Heiberg had studied them until now. One of them, titled The Method, has special historical significance. It could be considered the earliest known work on calculus.

Archimedes wrote The Method almost two thousand years before Isaac Newton and Gottfried Wilhelm von Leibniz developed calculus in the 1700s. Reviel Netz, an historian of mathematics at Stanford University who transcribed the text, says that the examination of Archimedes' work has revealed "a new twist on the entire trajectory of Western mathematics."

In The Method, Archimedes was working out a way to compute the areas and volumes of objects with curved surfaces, which was also one of the problems that motivated Newton and Leibniz. Ancient mathematicians had long struggled to "square the circle" by calculating its exact area. That problem turned out to be impossible using only a straightedge and compass, the only tools the ancient Greeks allowed themselves. Nevertheless, Archimedes worked out ways of computing the areas of many other curved regions.

Such problems are tricky because solving them directly requires slicing up curved areas into infinitely many areas with straight boundaries. But the concept of infinity is a slippery and troublesome one that can quickly lead to paradox.

The Greek philosopher Aristotle built defenses against infinity's vexing qualities by distinguishing between the "potential infinite" and the "actual infinite." An infinitely long line would be actually infinite, whereas a line that could always be extended would be potentially infinite. Aristotle argued that the actual infinite didn't exist.

Archimedes developed rigorous methods of dealing with infinity—still used today—in which he followed Aristotle's injunction. For example, Archimedes proved that the area of a section of a parabola is four-thirds the area of the triangle inside it (shown in red in the diagram below). To do so, he built a straight-lined figure that's an approximation of the curvy one. Then he showed that he could make the approximation as close as anyone could ever demand to both the section of the parabola and to four-thirds the area of the triangle.

f8914_4774.gif

Archimedes showed that the area of this section of a parabola is four-thirds the area of the enclosed triangle (red). He did it using a straight-lined approximation (blue).
Rehmeyer

Critically, Archimedes never claimed that by adding triangles forever, you could make the straight-line construction exactly equal to the section of the parabola. That would require an actual infinity of triangles. Instead, he just said that you can make the approximation as good as you like, so he was sticking with potential infinity.

Modern historians and mathematicians have always believed whenever Archimedes dealt with infinities, he kept strictly to the potential kind. But Netz, who transcribed the newly found text, says that the recent discoveries show that Archimedes indeed used the notion of actual infinity. Netz and the project's lead researcher, William Noel of the Walters Art Museum in Baltimore, have co-authored a new book, The Archimedes Codex, which describes this discovery and the other facets of the project. It is scheduled for release on Nov. 1 of this year.

Archimedes's key argument about infinity appears on pages so damaged that Heiberg had been unable to transcribe them. Archimedes calculated the volume of a body shaped something like a fingernail by enclosing it in a volume bounded by plane surfaces. But instead of making better and better approximations of the curved figure, as he had done with the parabolic section, he pondered a two-dimensional slice through the larger volume enclosing the smaller one.

f8914_5260.jpg

Archimedes computed the area of the curved figure (left) by enclosing it in a bigger one with straight edges (right). He then examined random slices to compute the volume—using the concept of actual infinity.
The owner of the Archimedes Palimpsest.

Archimedes found a relationship between the full area of that slice, which was a section through the plane-sided volume, and the smaller area within it, which was a section through the curved shape. Then he argued that he could use that relationship to calculate the entire volume of the curved shape, because both the curved figure and the straight one contained the same number of slices. That number just happened to be infinity—actual infinity.

"The interesting breakthrough is that he is completely willing to operate with actual infinity," Netz says, but he adds that "the argument is definitely not completely valid. He just had a strong intuition that it should work." In this case, it did work, but it remained for Newton and Leibniz to figure out how to make the argument mathematically rigorous.

Newton and Leibniz also worked with actual infinity. Leibniz went so far as to say in a letter, "I am so in favor of the actual infinite that instead of admitting that Nature abhors it, as is commonly said, I hold that Nature makes frequent use of it everywhere, in order to show more effectively the perfections of its Author."

Modern calculus no longer makes use of the actual infinite; it sticks with Aristotle's distinction. Philosophers still argue over the legitimacy of the notion of actual infinity. Netz argues, however, that The Method reveals the originality and daring of Archimedes's thought and shows that he anticipated some of the bold steps that would later lead to the full development of calculus.


References:

Netz, R., and W. Noel. 2007. The Archimedes Codex. Cambridge, Mass.: Da Capo Press. See http://www.perseusbooksgroup.com/dacapo/
book_detail.jsp?isbn=030681580X
.

Netz, R. 2002. Proof, amazement, and the unexpected. Science 298(Nov. 1):967-968. Available at http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/298/5595/967.

Stein, S. 1999. Archimedes: What Did He Do Besides Cry Eureka? Washington, D.C.: Mathematical Association of America. See http://www.maa.org/reviews/archim.html.

Further Readings:

Klarreich, E. 2004. Glimpses of genius. Science News 165(May 15):314-315. Available at http://www.sciencenews.org/articles/20040515/bob9.asp.

Peterson, I. 2004. Squaring circles. Science News Online (Oct. 30). Available at http://www.sciencenews.org/articles/20041030/mathtrek.asp.

Peterson, I. 2002. Ancient infinities. Science News Online (Nov. 23). Available at http://www.sciencenews.org/articles/20021123/mathtrek.asp.

Peterson, I. 2000. Unveiling the work of Archimedes. Science News 157(Jan. 29):77. Available to subscribers at http://www.sciencenews.org/articles/20000129/note18.asp.

An article outlining the history of the concept of infinity can be found at http://www-gap.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/
HistTopics/Infinity.html
.

For more information on the Archimedes Palimpsest project, go to http://www.archimedespalimpsest.org.

Comments

Pii or (3.14159.....)really has infinity imbedded in its definition. A circle,after all, is really a symmetric polygon with an un-ending number of small sides...How many sides? Find out how many decimal places in pii and you have your answer....ed kobek..bsee northwestern U.

Thanks very much for the wonderful article with the title 'A Prayer for Archimedes'. It is indeed tragic his great work was lost for so long - almost 2000 years. I am going to purchase the book 'The Archimedes Codex' and get all the details.

'Netz and the project's lead researcher, William Noel of the Walters Art Museum in Baltimore, have co-authored a new book, The Archimedes Codex, which describes this discovery and the other facets of the project. It is scheduled for release on Nov. 1 of this year.'

Err... It was published in May.

[Amazon.co.uk link]



The British edition came out in May. The American edition is being released Nov. 1. -- jjr

I always suspected Archimedes had more up his sleeve than we ever knew!

It would have been nice to included a brief explanation of why or how the use of infinity has changed in relatively recent history.

Here's my perspective:

In 1900, Cantor's problem of the cardinal number of the continuum was #1 on Hilbert's list of mathematical problems to be addressed in the new century. Basically, Hilbert said "We gotta figure out what the heck Cantor has done to infinity!"

A few decades later Godel supplied an answer, indirectly. That answer caused us to think about infinity in a new way.

The philosophical infinity may remain tricky but after Godel, mathematical infinity became nothing but a symbol. It doesn't have any verbally anthroporphic meaning, really. It just works, is all.

When I studied Nomography at MIT, the professor said that Projective Geometry was the one major mathematical thing the Greeks could have done but didn't. In PG, the concept of infinity is commonly addressed, by means of Homogeneous Cartesian Coordinates. Using the General Projective Transformation Matrix, points or even the line at infinity can be projected to appear locally. Of course, a point or line previously local will now be at infinity in the newly projected plane. Many of these are discussed further in Wikipedia.

I forgot to mention, in Projective Geometry, we can see that "parallel lines meet at infinity" and even project the previously infinite point at which they meet so that it is now local. It turns out that in PG, the same infinite point is in both directions of the parallel lines. With such casual use of infinity, perhaps Projective Geometry (PG) should be rated R? (grin)

Why the headlines? The article makes clear that J.L. Heiberg and seen the text 100 years ago. I believe that he published "The Method" in his great edition of Archimedes. It's nice that the original palimpsest has been recovered, but the information was already available, wasn't it?



The only tool Heiberg used to examine the palimpsest was a microscope. As a result, he was unable to transcribe the critical theorem in which Archimedes uses actual infinity. --jjr

1. I certainly agree that The Method was surely not as complete a description of Archimedes's work as the recent methods of 'seeing through' the monk's cleaning and overwriting efforts. It is worth the headline.

2. Aristotle has to be correct in viewing 'actual infinity' as impossible.

Infinity is a valuable mathematical abstraction concerning measurement. Measurement holds a matching standard against the quality being measured. Thus, for any number of instances of length (in distance or space)or time etc. one can demarcate a certain range as the standard unit, and then measure things with that unit.

Every such standard is necessarily based on qualities within the Universe. There can be no standard by which one steps outside of the Universe in order to measure it. Furthermore, the Universe as a single entity must be finite, a unit of One, not of "infinity". It is the UNIverse not the INFINIverse.

Another area where infinity is often misapplied is time. Time is considered to continue to infinity, forwards and backwards, and to somehow include the duration of the Universe. But Time is only a correlation of clocks & calendars with their primary referents: the Earth's rotation and annual orbit, respectively. That is, Time is merely a relationship mankind uses to gauge (measure) movements of objects against certain standard movements IN the Universe.

Time is therefore not something apart from the Universe. It is strictly a function of objects within the Universe. Because there can be no thing "apart from the Universe". One cannot ask, "How old is the Universe?", because there is no reference point for movement against which the 'movement' of the Universe may be measured.

Returning to the notion of dimensions, one cannot ask, "Where is the Universe?" because there can be no reference point outside of it. For the same reason, no one can one ask how big it is. There is no standard by which it can be measured, but it certainly is not "actually" infinite.

To fully grasp the above, it helps to appreciate what Parmenides understood, "Ex nihilo nihil fit" — Latin for "out of nothing, nothing comes".

Because Nothing is literally nothing, the Universe cannot have risen out of nothing, Big Bang theories and Age-of-the-Universe calculations notwithstanding! "Nothing" can have no way of starting or becoming anything. Consequently, the Universe just is. It can have no beginning and no end. "No end" because the converse of Ex nihilo nihil fit is that something cannot become nothing.

Infinity is just a very useful, abstract mathematical tool for dealing with impracticably large numbers that arise from certain calculations that allow for mathematically unending improvements in precision.

One of these days an ancient codex will reveal that Archimedes invented the light bulb & the transistor. Count on it.

Rnbramwell says it is meaningless to speak of the age of the universe. Then to what does the current calculation that the universe is roughly 13.5 billion years old refer?

Does he mean that the "precise" age is meaningless?

Regarding your comment on paradox, you should learn more about the new historiography of set theory, which sheds a great deal of light on the nature of paradox as well as Poincare's understanding and his influence on Einstein. For some reason, we seem to be enjoying a renaissance in this field. It has importance for relativity, because Poincare's responses to the set theory discussions found their way into Science and Hypothesis, which so influenced Einstein. I think it is becoming more clear that Einstein's adoption of natural mathematics (what he called "practical geometry") through Poincare and others, was really the important step in his thinking, with consequences which were not so good.

I discuss some of the new work in the essay below.

Cordially yours,
John Ryskamp


Ryskamp, John Henry, "Paradox, Natural Mathematics, Relativity and Twentieth-Century Ideas" (May 19, 2007). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=897085

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)